As a new year approaches, is seems appropriate to take a few minutes and reflect on our work during the previous 12 months. Looking back, 2015 was a wildly successful year as we launched Citizen Cabinets in Maryland, Oklahoma and Virginia.

Thousands of registered voters participated in the Citizen Cabinets in those states, along with a representative sample of registered voters across the United States, providing national results in addition to our state-based efforts. Citizens weighed in on the looming funding shortfall in Social Security, how to fix the U.S. Postal Service and an in-depth assessment of the multi-national agreement over Iran’s nuclear enrichment program.

Armed with specific recommendations from constituents, we met with dozens of congressional offices to brief members of Congress and their staffs on the findings. We’re happy to report each staffer and member with whom we spoke was very appreciative of our efforts and the data that we provided. We also met with numerous outside groups like the League of Women Voters and local citizen organizations to discuss the Citizen Cabinet initiative

The Citizen Cabinet reports generated a high level of interest from the media, garnering coverage in the major newspapers in Oklahoma (The Oklahoman, Tulsa World), Maryland (The Baltimore Sun, Annapolis Capital Gazette) and Virginia (The Virginian-Pilot, Roanoke Times). The Washington Post also published excellent news coverage on multiple occasions, as did other “Beltway” press including The Hill and the Federal Times.

Time Magazine, the New Yorker, Christian Science Monitor, Voice of America and Slate also reported on the work of our partners at the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation. The New York Times editorial board cited an Iran study in an editorial published in March. VOP President Steven Kull and Executive Director Richard Parsons were interviewed by radio and TV stations in our states, and Kull did interviews with DC-based broadcast outlets as well.

We were also successful in engaging our university partners with outreach efforts that included town hall type discussions, media appearances and op-ed submissions. The support from our bipartisan advisory board has also been outstanding and very much appreciated.

One key partnership worthy of mentioning is our new relationship with Nielsen Scarborough, which has allowed us to reach tens of thousands of potential Citizen Cabinet participants. With this, we will be able to gather important data on what American voters want their Congress to do to address pressing issues including the Defense budget, Medicare, climate and energy, poverty and many others.

Beginning in 2016, we will be developing Citizen Cabinets in the three most populous states, California, New York and Texas, as well as two crucial electoral swing states, Florida and Ohio. We are already meeting with key congressional offices and media outlets to set the stage for our work in those new regions.

Lastly, we are very grateful for the support of our friends in the public at large. Your generous financial donations and your continued interest in our work is gratifying and appreciated.

To all, our sincere thanks for your help in a successful year of giving Americans a more impactful voice in government. We look forward to ever greater successes in the year to come!


Why Washington’s stuffiest institutions need to reconnect with America.

In the 1980s and ’90s, yet a third wave of research organizations emerged: boutique think tanks dedicated to specific clusters of issues, such as education policy, budget policy, trade policy, environmental policy, and so on. These specialized think tanks have been instrumental in developing innovative policy solutions, including contributions to reforming health care, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and expanding access to technology. Meanwhile, the private sector entered the lists of think tanks. The McKinsey Global Institute launched in 1990 with the mission “to provide leaders in the commercial, public, and social sectors with the facts and insights on which to base management and policy decisions.” It has spawned a number of imitators sponsored by banks and private equity funds. This proliferation of research institutions with high fixed costs (buildings, fellowships, and faculty “chairs”) has also meant a ferocious competition for a relatively limited funding pool. New funding models lean more heavily on corporations and foreign donors to provide those all-important unrestricted funds, opening the door to accusations of corruption and bias.

The decades of growth and expansion in the think tank sector have resulted in an explosion of production— multiple policy white papers are released virtually every day in Washington—some of it extraordinary in quality and depth. But inevitably, our think tanks reflect (and sometimes amplify) the partisanship, compartmentalization, and money in politics that cut against the mission of these organizations to support evidence-based good government. And even the best of us are disconnected from the communities our ideas are developed to serve. As such, the Progressive Era model of think tanks as extensions of technocratic governance is no longer sufficient to make meaningful, large-scale progress in resolving public problems. Policy reports for a specialized Washington audience can still influence executive orders and occasionally actual legislation if the congressional stars align, an increasingly rare event. Some of these decisions can be historic, but those are exceptional.

We find that in today’s America, a great deal of the most meaningful change is happening far outside Washington, in cities and towns across the country. It is happening in places that are tackling the deeper problem of democratic distrust and disaffection by re-forging the links between citizen demand and government response. It is this spirit that animates the new forms of public work and institution building that we characterize as civic enterprise. These new forms of public problem solving bring the business of needs assessment, deliberation, and policy development into communities and then seek to deliver the results back to decision-makers at the local, state, and federal levels.

Civic enterprise describes a broad way of working, but a number of existing organizations exemplify, at least partially, what we have in mind. The Lown Institute, for instance, is a hybrid think tank/advocacy group that is tackling the problem of overtreatment and poor quality in the health care delivery system by mobilizing doctors, nurses, faith groups, and others to create grassroots pressure for reform. Another example is Voice of the People, a nonprofit promoting “deliberative democracy.” VOP pulls together representative panels of average citizens who, aided by technology and a bipartisan group of experts and facilitators, think through solutions to thorny public policy problems and present their collective ideas to decisionmakers and the public. At New America we have our own experiment in civic enterprise, Opportunity@Work, which is aimed at “rewiring” the job market by rethinking traditional ideas of hiring by credentials in order to implement new methods for matching talent to jobs.

To read the full article, click here.

By Anne-Marie Slaughter and Ben Scott

________________________________________________________

This artice first appeared in the November/December 2015 edition of Washington Monthly magazine




Follow Us