Asked in polls, overwhelming majorities of Americans believe that if Members of Congress were to consult the people, they would be more likely to find common ground on many of the issues that have led to partisan gridlock.

The Program for Public Consultation has found that the public is largely right.  On a wide range of issues that have vexed Congress, citizens—going through policymaking simulations—have found bipartisan common ground on such issues as:

  • Reforming the criminal justice system
  • Addressing the shortfalls for Social Security and Medicare
  • What spending priorities should be
  • Reducing the budget deficit
  • How to balance concerns about the environment and the economy
  • What the Federal government should do about poverty
  • Addressing the challenges of immigration
  • Nuclear Weapons Policy
  • International Trade, International Security & Military Alliances
  • Whether the FCC should repeal net neutrality
  • How to save the U.S. Postal Service
  • United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

  • 170 Policy Positions Supported by both Republicans and Democrats

    Voice of the People’s The Common Ground of the American People project seeks to identify policy positions that have bipartisan public support. The project has so far found 170 common ground positions over a wide range of issues:

    THE FEDERAL BUDGET
    Discretionary Spending
    Revenues
    Taxes
    GOVERNMENT REFORM
    Campaign Finance
    Lobbying Restrictions
    House Redistricting
    Term Limits
    3rd Party & and Independent Candidates
    ENVIRONMENT & ENERGY
    Tax Incentives
    Regulations
    Greenhouse Gas Reduction
    Fossil Fuel Extraction
    POLICE REFORM
    Use of Force
    Increasing Accountability
    SENTENCING REFORM
    Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
    CRIMINAL RECORDS
    Employment & Licensing
    Public Housing
    Sealing Criminal Records
    Voting Rights
    SOCIAL SECURITY
    Addressing the Shortfall
    Increasing Benefits


    IMMIGRATION REFORM
    Immigrants Without Legal Status
    Reducing Illegal Immigration
    Work Visas
    Refugees
    FEDERAL POVERTY PROGRAMS
    Food Assistance
    Child Poverty
    Helping the Working Poor
    MEDICARE
    Reducing Benefit Payments
    Reducing Payments to Providers
    Increasing Revenues
    Controlling Costs in Other Ways
    HEALTHCARE
    Expanding Health Insurance Options
    Preserving ACA Rules on Insurance Cost
    Reducing Healthcare Costs
    NET NEUTRALITY
    Repeal of Net Neutrality Regulations
    INTERNATIONAL TRADE
    International Trade Agreements
    Mitigating the Negative Effects of Trade

    INTERNATIONAL SECURITY
    & MILITARY ALLIANCES

    Principle of Collective Security
    Mutual Defense Treaties
    NUCLEAR WEAPONS POLICY
    Arms Control Treaties
    Nuclear Weapon Capacities
    First Use of Nuclear Weapons
    Iran Nuclear Agreement
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
    United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

    The analysis of public opinion is conducted by the Program for Public Consultation (PPC) at the University of Maryland. It draws not on standard polls, but in-depth surveys in which respondents receive briefings on key policy proposals and evaluate pro and con arguments for each, only then making their recommendations. Expert opponents and proponents of each policy review the content of the surveys, ensuring that the briefings are accurate and balanced, and the arguments are the strongest possible ones. As a result, the support these policies elicit is resilient and not likely to fade as soon as someone hears a counter argument.

    The majority of the findings are from PPC, which conducts its surveys online so that respondents can take whatever time they need to fully consider the briefings and arguments. Others are from the “deliberative polls” of the Center for Deliberative Democracy at Stanford University which include an in-person event with briefings and discussions.